|
PWS Articles PWS Research
Other |
[ Printable Page | Edit ]
Research Notes: Testing and Diagnosis of Growth Hormone DeficiencyNote: This page is a collection of notes and research abstracts about testing and diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency. Please see here for the article about the consensus recommendations for growth hormone treatment. Pituitary. 2007 Apr 11. Measurement of circulating growth hormone (GH) concentrations is essential in diagnosis of either GH deficiency or GH excess. The invention of immunoassays for the measurement of peptide hormones was a major breakthrough, enabling the routine analysis of GH concentrations in larger series of samples. Over the last few decades, measurement technology has evolved from less sensitive, mainly radioactive assays based on polyclonal antisera to the latest generations of highly sensitive chemiluminescence methods employing monoclonal antibodies. Unfortunately, the development of newer assays did not lead to better agreement among the results obtained by different assay methods. On the contrary, the differences tended to increase when monoclonal antibody based assays became more popular. The actual value reported for the GH concentration in a specific patient's sample still mainly depends on the method used by the respective laboratory, limiting the applicability of international consensus guidelines in clinical practice. The heterogeneity of the analyte itself, the availability of different reference preparations for calibration and the interference from matrix components such as GH binding protein are among the reasons why standardizing GH assays is difficult. An additional challenge arose from the availability of a GH receptor antagonist for the treatment of acromegaly, which is basically a mutated form of GH and therefore interferes in many GH assays. This review provides an overview on GH assays used in clinical practice, their limitations and the potential next steps towards standardization. Pituitary. 2007 Apr 11. The diagnosis of disorders of growth hormone (GH) is dependent upon accurate measurement of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations since serum IGF-I assays have been found to be useful as a screening tests for the presence of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children and in both children and adults they have been found very useful in establishing the diagnosis of acromegaly. IGF-I is also used extensively to monitor the response to GH treatment in children and adults and to monitor the response to treatment in acromegaly. Since IGF-I is influenced by several other hormones and physiologic factors as well as GH, a knowledge of its regulation is essential to understanding how to properly interpret the measurements. Several technical criteria are required for successful laboratory estimation of IGF-I values. These include elimination of interference of IGF-I-binding proteins (IGFBP), utilization of adequate numbers of normal subjects to define the normal ranges and importantly the use of high affinity, high specificity antisera that allow precise and reproducible measurements of the biologically active peptide. Cross comparisons of various commercial assays show that the results generally are similar when values are in the normal range. However, the assays have different performance characteristics when concentrations are either above or below the normal range. To obtain cross laboratory standardization for values outside the normal range requires utilization of similar, high-quality reagents and techniques that are reasonably comparable. Without this degree of standardization, cross comparisons among various reference laboratories are likely to continue to show wide divergence for values that are above or below the 95% confidence interval. A future goal should be the development of standard procedures and reagents that eliminate this degree of variability. Pituitary. 2007 Apr 11. For nearly 30 years, the endogenous bioactivity of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) has been estimated by its circulating concentrations of immunoreactive IGF-I, obtained after either removal or inactivation of the IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), and today serum/plasma total IGF-I serves as a useful parameter in the diagnosis and clinical control of growth hormone (GH) disorders. Different assays for the measurement of free, unbound IGF-I were introduced more than a decade ago. Nevertheless, this measurement remains controversial, and in daily clinical practice serum total IGF-I has retained its position as the most widely used IGF-related measurement in GH disorders. This review will provide a survey of data on free versus total IGF-I, with particular reference to GH disorders. As it will be clear, there is reasonable clinical evidence to conclude that both in the diagnosis of as well as during treatment of patients with GH disorders, serum/plasma total IGF-I should remain the primary IGF-related measurement. However, in certain patients the inclusion of free IGF-I may be useful and therefore, some guidelines for the inclusion of free IGF-I measurements will be given. Horm Res. 2007.
Hypoglycaemia-insulin test: discordant growth hormone and cortisol response in paediatric patients regarding recovery from hypoglycaemia with or without oral glucose solution. BACKGROUND: Hypoglycaemia-insulin test (HIT) is the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of adrenal-pituitary-hypothalamic axis disorders. Controversy exists on the convenience of recovery from an insulin-induced hypoglycaemia since this test is not risk-free. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether recovery from insulin-induced hypoglycaemia with an oral glucose solution produces a different response of growth hormone (GH) and cortisol at different times of the study compared with spontaneous recovery from hypoglycaemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study of 100 children and adolescents with growth delay who underwent an HIT. Patients were consecutively assigned to two groups of 50. In one group recovery from hypoglycaemia occurred spontaneously and in the other recovery was achieved with an oral glucose solution (20 g of glucose) when glycaemia was under 30 mg/dl. The two groups did not differ in age, sex, pubertal status, weight, height and IGF-I levels. RESULTS: The response of GH at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min and cortisol at 10, 60, 90 and 120 min was lower and statistically significant in patients with recovery from hypoglycaemia with oral glucose solution. GH deficiency was diagnosed more frequently in patients recovered with glucose solutions (94%) compared to those with spontaneous recovery (68%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral glucose solution administration when glycaemia was under 30 mg/dl in HIT produced a lower GH and cortisol response to insulin stimulus and a greater frequency of GH deficit diagnosis. Acta Clin Belg. 2006 Nov-Dec. IGF-1 measurement is used for screening of GH deficiency and monitoring of GH therapy in children. However, several commercial immunoassays are currently used and reference values provided by manufacturers are very different. The aim of this study was to compare commercial IGF-1 assays 1) in terms of absolute values and 2) in terms of clinical interpretation of results based on IGF-1 reference values in serum samples from children with GH therapy, with untreated GH deficiency and with obesity. Serum samples of 9 patients were sent frozen to 5 university hospitals using 5 different IGF-1 assays. The inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for the 9 samples. For clinical interpretation, results were expressed as SD scores based on reference values provided by manufacturers (and used in these laboratories). The mean inter-laboratory CV (range) for the 9 serum samples was 25.8% (16.7-35.9%). Major variability was noted in the SD-scores between IGF-1 assays for 3 tested serum samples from GH-treated patients with a difference between the lowest and highest SD score of 2.6 up to 3.2. In conclusion, there is a large variability among commercial IGF-1 immunoassays, not only in terms of absolute values, but also in terms of clinical interpretation in pediatric serum samples.There is a need for IGF-1 immunoassay harmonization and for the establishment of adequate reference values. Endocr Regul. 2006 Sep. OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is routinely based on the results of two stimulating tests performed with different stimuli. Arbitrarily established, equal cutoff levels for the tests with different pharmacological stimuli, as well as a relatively high incidence of falsely decreased (FD) response in the tests have been reported. Falsely decreased GH response in one of the two performed tests does not exclude FD response in the second one, so, it seems very important to assess the incidence of FD response in both GH stimulating tests. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The analysis comprised the results of two GH stimulating tests (the 1st one with clonidine, the 2nd one with either insulin or glucagon) performed in 780 short children. RESULTS: The mean GH peak in the test with clonidine was significantly higher than that in both other tests (p<0.01). The rate of decreased GH secretion was 48.7 % in the test with clonidine, 80.5 % in the test with insulin and 81.5 % in the test with glucagon. Similar frequency of normal and subnormal test results was obtained for the cut-off value for the tests with insulin and with glucagon at the level of 6.4 ng/ml. The correlation between the results of the two tests as performed in particular patients was weak (r=0.27; p<0.05). Following cases of test results were found: 1. both results normal (1st NT, 2nd NT) in 117 patients (15.0 %), 2. 1st result normal, while the 2nd one falsely decreased (1st NT, 2nd FD) in 283 (36.3 %), 3. reverse situation (1st FD, 2nd NT) in 62 (7.9 %), 4. both results decreased in 318 (40.8 %), either truly (1st TD, 2nd TD) or falsely (1st FD, 2nd FD) - with unknown incidence. The following incidences (probabilities - P) result from the above data: A. P(1st NT, 2nd NT) = P(1st NT) intersection P(2nd NT) = 0.150; B. P(1st NT, 2nd FD) = P(1st NT) intersection P(2nd FD) = 0.363; C. P(1st FD, 2nd NT) = P(1st FD) intersection P(2nd NT) = 0.079. The expression (B intersection C)/A was calculated by transforming the right side of the equations: (B x C)/A = 0.192. Thus, 19.2 %, out of all 780 patients, i.e., 150 children (47.2 % of 318 patients, assessed as GH-deficient), could have both test results FD. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences in GH response to particular pharmacological stimuli, as well as the high incidence of falsely decreased GH response in the two stimulating tests, should be taken into account in qualifying short children to GH therapy. Endocr Regul. 2006 Jun. OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone (GH) secretion is routinely assessed in provocative tests. However, some limitations of these tests have been reported, including a weak correlation between spontaneous GH secretion and GH peak in stimulating tests, poor reproducibility of test results and normalisation of previously decreased GH response to stimulation in the repeated provocative tests. The observed discrepancies between the results of consecutive GH stimulating tests in the same patient may be explained either by real changes in GH secretion or by the poor reproducibility of GH response to stimulation. Normalisation of previously decreased GH secretion should entail the increase of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentration, while stability of IGF-I secretion despite divergent GH response to stimulation in repeated tests might indicate the poor reproducibility of GH stimulating tests. The aim of the study was a comparison of GH peak in repeated stimulating tests and of corresponding, simultaneously measured IGF-I concentration. METHODS: The investigation comprised 84 children with short stature who underwent repeated GH tests and IGF-I evaluation. In 60 patients each of two different tests (with clonidine and with glucagon, in standard doses) was performed twice, together with IGF-I measurement during both evaluations. In 20 patients (remaining in the same pubertal stage during the time period between the procedures in question) at least one test, together with IGF-I measurement, was repeated within one year. RESULTS: The correlation between the results of GH tests, repeated during the two evaluations, was weak (r=0.22, p<0.05 for all patients and r=0.25, p<0.05 for the patients examined 2 times within 1 year), with the high within-subject variability (43.4 % and 59.5 %, respectively). Conversely, the correlation between two values of IGF-I SDS was good both for all patients (r=0.65, p<0.05) and especially for the patients examined twice within 1 year (r=0.96, p<0.05), with low within-subject variability for the latter subgroup of patients (11.2 %). The same GH stimulating tests, performed twice in the same patient, led to different conclusions (either the confirmation of GHD diagnosis or its exclusion) in most of examined patients. Poor reproducibility of GH stimulating tests, rather than the possibility of short-term changes in GH secretion, was confirmed. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005. Our understanding of the IGF-I system has increased dramatically in recent yr due in part to the advances in molecular and cellular biology. Not only can we now measure circulating levels of the members of this axis in order to address the possibly pathophysiological changes, but genetic alterations can now be identified as the underlying cause of specific clinical situations. In normal children, circulating levels of IGF-I and the IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) change throughout development and in some cases are gender dependent. Children and adolescents with a variety of illnesses and metabolic disorders have altered circulating IGF-I and IGFBP levels. Hence, in children or adolescents with exogenous obesity, anorexia nervosa, coeliac disease, leukaemia and other types of cancer, as well as in cases of GH deficiency, this axis can be altered. These data may help us to understand the physiology and pathophysiology of this system, but the clinical or diagnostic utility of these measurements is still largely debated. Indeed, in most of the above mentioned illnesses, circulating IGF and IGFBP levels overlap with normal values. Furthermore, these measurements do not provide data concerning levels of these factors at target tissues or of local synthesis and autocrine-paracrine effects. However, measurements of IGF-I and its binding proteins, as well as GH and its binding proteins, can help us to focus our analysis of patients suspected to have genetic abnormalities on the GH receptor, IGF-I, its receptor, IGFALS, or intracellular signalling proteins such as STAT5b or ERK. Possibly, the most clear clinical utility of circulating IGF-I measurements in children is in cases of GH deficiency or insensitivity or under GH treatment. However, the fact there are cases of children with non-detectable levels of circulating IGF-I that yet normal height and growth velocity, or with non-detectable levels of GH yet normal growth and IGF-I levels, raises many questions. Furthermore, circulating IGF-I levels may be within the normal control levels and the child may have a pathological growth pattern. Hence, just how useful are these measurements? Another clinically important question pertains to GH treatment in patients, such as in the Turner Syndrome, where supraphysiological levels of serum IGF-I are reached in order to induce growth. The interpretation and clinical utility of measurements of circulating IGF-I and its BPs are currently being widely discussed. As our knowledge of this system increases, with the identification of new members of this family and its intracellular mechanisms of action, as well as new genetic alterations in patients, the interpretation of laboratory results will also improve and help to better our diagnostic capability. Horm Res. 2005. BACKGROUND: A stepwise increment of the GH dose is an approach aimed at avoiding adverse events. We investigated GH sensitivity by studying IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations during the initial phase of GH treatment. METHODS: Our investigation was part of the regular follow-up of prepubertal children with GH deficiency (GHD) (n = 31) and small for gestational age (SGA) (n = 23). Dosage was increased in three steps: one-third at the start, two-thirds after 14 days, and the full dose after 28 days (full dose: GHD = 28 microg/kg body weight (BW)/day; SGA = 60 microg/kg BW/day). Blood samples were taken on days 0, 14 and 28, as well as in conjunction with anthropometrical examinations after 3, 6 and 12 months. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured by means of published in-house RIAs and age-related references were used to calculate standard deviation scores (SDS). Height velocity (cm/year) and Delta HT SDS were taken as growth response parameters. RESULTS: Before GH treatment (GHD vs. SGA; median and p values): age (years) (6.6 vs. 6.0; n.s.), HT SDS (-2.6 vs. -3.2; p < 0.05); GH amount after stepping up (mug/kg BW/day) (28 vs. 60; p < 0.01); BW SDS (-0.5 vs. -2.9; p < 0.01); max. GH stimulated (microg/l) (5.6 vs. 10.8; p < 0.01); IGF-I SDS (-3.5 vs. -1.8; p < 0.01); IGFBP-3 SDS (-2.0 vs. 0.8; p < 0.01). After 1 year of GH therapy: HT velocity (cm/year) (9.8 vs. 9.6; n.s.), Delta HT SDS (0.9 vs. 0.9; n.s.); WT velocity (kg/year) (3.3 vs. 3.5; n.s.). Our results show that changes in growth similar to GHD could be induced in SGA by a dosage that was twice as high as the replacement dose given in GHD. GH dose and HT velocity did not correlate in both groups. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 increased as follows in GHD and SGA during stepping up of the dosage (ng/ml, GHD vs. SGA): at start, 54 vs. 89; at day 14, 78 vs. 132; at day 28, 90 vs. 167; at 3 months, 118 vs. 218. There was the same relationship between dose levels and absolute IGF-I concentrations in both groups. In terms of IGF-I SDS, the dose-response curve in SGA showed a shift to the right in comparison to GHD, thus indicating lower sensitivity to GH. The dynamics of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 differed, as IGFBP-3 peaked earlier (on day 28). In GHD, IGF-I SDS at 3 months was -0.7 vs. +0.9 in SGA. Near-identical levels were found for Delta IGF-I SDS and IGFBP-3 SDS above basal levels for each time-point investigated. First year HT velocity in GHD correlated negatively with basal IGF-I SDS (R(2) = 0.33; p <0.001) and basal IGFBP-3 (R(2) = 0.17; p <0.05) but did not correlate with the IGF-I increment during the 0- to 3-month period. Conversely, first year HT velocity correlated (+) in SGA with the IGF SDS increment during the 0- to 3-month period (R(2) = 0.26; p = <0.05). Height velocity in SGA, however, correlated neither with basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 nor with the 0- to 3-month increments of IGFBP-3 SDS. CONCLUSIONS: IGFs increase during initial GH therapy, thus raising questions about short-term IGF generation tests. (I) In terms of IGF generation, substantially lower sensitivity to GH was observable in SGA. (II) Higher GH sensitivity during first year catch-up growth is associated with GHD, but in SGA it is attributable to increases in IGF. A wider range of GH dosages needs to be explored in order to gain further insight into the relationship between GH dose, IGF levels, and growth. Monitoring IGFs is a practical means for exploring GH sensitivity during dosage stepping up. Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Dec. Growth hormone (GH) measurements are complicated by the heterogeneous nature of GH, as well as by the presence of the GH binding protein in plasma. Several isoforms of GH exist, and specific assays for each are currently either unavailable, impractical, or not clinically indicated. Bioassays include the in vivo assays based on rat weight gain, tibial line widening, or IGF-I generation. In vitro bioassays, based on the proliferation of cell lines expressing the prolactin receptor or GH receptor, are sensitive but prone to nonspecific interference by factors present in serum. Immunoassays (RIA, IRMA, ELISA, and immunofunctional assay design) are widely used in the clinical laboratory because of speed, sensitivity, and convenience. Discrepancies among results rendered by different immunoassays have become more apparent as monoclonal assays have superseded polyclonal assays, presumably because different antibodies recognize different epitopes among the heterogeneous mixture of GH isoforms in serum. Some assays, especially those with short, nonequilibrium incubation times are vulnerable to interference by the GH binding protein present in serum. Recommendations are given for strategies designed to minimize disparity of results obtained by different GH immunoassays applied to serum. Urinary GH measurements, while technically feasible, are of limited clinical utility because of biological variation in urinary GH excretion. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2004 Mar-Apr. The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency is based on the GH biological response to pharmacological stimulation tests. The cut-off value defining normality is the same whatever the GH assay used. In a group of the French Society for Clinical Biology (SFBC), we have evaluated whether differences between the GH concentrations obtained with the 9 commercial GH assays available in France exist or not. The study samples consisted of 72 serum pools and serial dilutions of the recombinant GH 22 kDa international standard, IS 98/574. These dilutions were performed by using 3 different diluents: the specific diluent provided by the manufacturers and thus different from one assay to another, serum without GH and heparin plasma without GH. Despite being calibrated against the same international standard, the different assays proposed variable conversion factors between microg and mIU, and we decided to express the results in mIU. The GH concentrations obtained for the 72 serum pools with the 9 assays were highly correlated, but absolute concentrations were significantly different from one assay to another. In particular, the ratio between the concentrations measured with both assays giving the lowest and highest concentration in the same sample respectively was about 50%. In the recovery test executed by adding the international standard, the slope of the regression curve describing the relationship between expected and measured concentrations was different of 1 in all but one assay. Furthermore, for a given assay and a given expected concentration, the measured values were sometimes different by up to 30% depending on the diluent used. These results led us to advise the manufacturers to calibrate their assays against the recombinant GH international standard, IS 98/574, to take into account the matrix effect detected in our study and to use the official conversion factor of 3 mIU/microg. Waiting for this new calibration, it is recommended that the results should be expressed in mIU/L and that serum samples should be used for the measurement of GH instead of plasma samples. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004 Mar. OBJECTIVE: GH deficiency is diagnosed in children if serum GH fails to rise above a predefined cutoff value in response to at least two stimuli. Diagnostic decisions based on this testing are highly variable between centers and depend on the GH assays used. Considering the large spectrum of commercially available GH assays, we wanted to evaluate the agreement between assays, and to test whether assay-related variability of diagnostic decisions could be reduced by reassessment of peak GH concentrations in a reference center. DESIGN: We reanalysed 699 peak GH serum samples obtained after GH testing of 382 children and adolescents from 19 centers using three reference assays and compared these results with those obtained with the local assays. A subgroup of 132 patients tested with the combination of insulin hypoglycemia test and arginine test was evaluated for changes in the assignment to the diagnostic group of GH deficiency. RESULTS: The mean difference between methods ranged from 5.4 to 10.3 mU/l, slopes of the regression lines from 1.28 to 1.65. Significant non-linearity was detected in five of six assay comparisons, indicating that most assay results cannot be interconverted by the use of a factor. Overall agreement between reference and local assays was only moderate. Significant changes in diagnostic assignment occurred when different assays were used on the same patient (P<0.0001-P<0.0023). Based on GH remeasurement by one reference assay, 36 of 132 patients were categorized differently, with 35 patients changing into the GH-deficient group. Similar findings were obtained with the other reference assays. CONCLUSIONS: To decrease variability in GH testing related to assays and cutoff values, we recommend nationwide reassessment of GH peak sera in reference centers. Decisions to treat GH deficiency should incorporate the reference center results. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003 Sep. BACKGROUND/AIM: In childhood an appropriate response to GH treatment is achieved by titration of growth response against dose administered, with careful observation for side-effects. In order to evaluate the potential use of IGF monitoring in children treated with GH, a cross-sectional study has been carried in 215 children and adolescents (134 with GH deficiency (GHD), 54 with Turner syndrome (TS) and 27 with non-GHD growth disorders) treated with GH for 0.2-13.7 years. METHODS: IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were measured in ELISAs, using dried capillary blood collected onto filter papers. Results were expressed as the mean S.D. range (SDS). Values of either analyte < -2 or > +2 SDS were considered abnormal. RESULTS: IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS were higher in the TS and non-GHD groups (mean +0.01 and +0.1 respectively) than in those with GHD (mean value -0.6). Nineteen per cent of the IGF-I values (13% low, 6% high) and 12% of IGFBP-3 values were abnormal (10% low, 2% high). Abnormalities, either low or high, were most common in the GHD group. There was a weak but significant relationship between change in height SDS over the Year up to the time of sampling in the whole group and IGF-I SDS. Satisfactory growth performance (+0.5>change in height SDS> -0.5) was found in those with high (7.2%), normal (60%) and low (9.3%) IGF-I levels. Overall, it was estimated that 26% of the tests would indicate that an adjustment to GH dose (up in 18% and down in 8%) could be considered. CONCLUSIONS: From this cross-sectional study of IGF monitoring across a broad range of diagnoses and ages, it can be concluded that the majority of children on GH have normal levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, but 26% of tests could suggest that a change of GH dose should be considered. Regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 should be considered in any child on GH treatment. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2003 May. To establish the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD), GH-deficient children transitioning to adulthood are evaluated by two separate stimuli 2 or more weeks after ceasing GH therapy. While 20-88% of children diagnosed with idiopathic GHD retest with normal values, those with proven genetic defects in GH production/secretion/bioactivity and patients with panhypopituitarism consistently test deficient. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines GHD in adults by stimulated peak serum GH concentrations <5 ng/ml if measured by polyclonal radioimmunoassays (RIA) or lower if measured by monoclonal assays. Some investigators define severe GHD by a peak GH concentration <3 ng/ml. Adult responses to arginine and glucagon testing are similar to the responses to insulin tolerance testing; clonidine, pyridostigmine, and galanin cause lesser peaks of GH. Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) combined with arginine, GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6), or hexarelin leads to higher peak responses than GHRH alone. Thus the choice of testing methods impacts the diagnosis of GHD in transition patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002 Aug. OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of GH insufficiency (GHI) in childhood is not straightforward. Our aim was to test the sensitivity and specificity of height velocity (HV), IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and GH stimulation tests alone or in combination in the diagnosis of GHI. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients with GHI and idiopathic short stature (ISS) diagnosed in our centre and followed up to the completion of linear growth. PATIENTS: Thirty-three GHI children and 56 children with ISS were evaluated. GHI diagnosis was based on fulfilment of anthropometric, endocrine and neuroradiological criteria: stature < or = -2 z-score, delayed bone age (at least 1 year), GH peak response to at least two different provocative tests < 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l), brain MRI positive for hypothalamus-pituitary abnormalities, catch-up growth during the first year of GH replacement therapy > or = 75th centile, peak GH response to a third provocative test after growth completion < 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l). Children with anthropometry resembling that of GHI but with peak GH responses > 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l) were diagnosed as ISS. MEASUREMENTS: All subjects underwent standard anthropometry. GH secretory status was assessed by clonidine, arginine and GHRH plus arginine stimulation tests. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 circulating levels were measured by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA). The following cut-off values were chosen to discriminate between GHI and nonGHI short children: HV < 25th centile over the 6-12 months prior to the initiation of GH therapy, peak GH responses < 10 or < 7 micro g/l (< 20 or < 14 mU/l) and IGF-I and IGFBP-3-values < -1.9 z-score. Sensitivity (true positive ratio) and specificity (true negative ratio) were evaluated. RESULTS: Taking 10 micro g/l (20 mU/l) as the cut-off value, sensitivity was 100% and specificity 57% for GH provocative tests, whereas taking 7 as the cut-off value, sensitivity was 66% and specificity rose to 78%. Sensitivity was 73% for IGF-I and 30% for IGFBP-3 measurement, whilst specificity was 95% for IGF-I and 98% for IGFBP-3 evaluation. HV assessment revealed a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 43%. When HV and IGF-I evaluations were used in combination, sensitivity reached 95% and specificity 96%. When both HV and IGF-I are normal (26% of our subjects) GHI may be ruled out, whereas when both the indices are subnormal (23%) GHI is so highly likely that the child may undergo only one GH provocative test and brain MRI and, thereafter, may begin GH therapy without any further test. In case of discrepancy, when IGF-I is normal and HV < 25th centile (44% of children), due to the relatively low sensitivity of IGF-I assessment and low specificity of HV, the patient should undergo GH tests and brain MRI. Finally, in the rare case of HV > 25th centile and subnormal IGF-I-values (7%), due to the high specificity of IGF-I measurement, the child should undergo one provocative test and brain MRI for the high suspicion of GHI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a simple assessment of HV and basal IGF-I may exclude or, in association with only one stimulation test, confirm the diagnosis of GH insufficiency in more than half of patients with short stature. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002 Mar. OBJECTIVES: In the majority of children with short stature, the etiology is unknown. Mutations of the GH receptor (GHR) have been reported in a few children with apparent idiopathic short stature (ISS). These patients had low IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and GH-binding protein (GHBP), but a normal or exaggerated GH response to provocative stimuli, suggestive of partial GH insensitivity (GHI). We attempted to identify children with partial GHI syndrome, based on their response to GH provocative stimuli and other parameters of the GH-IGF-I axis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four pre-pubertal children (97 boys, 67 girls) aged 7.2 (0.5-16.75) years were studied. All had short stature with height <3rd centile. The weight, bone age (BA) and body mass index (BMI) of the subjects, as well as the parents' heights and mid parental height (MPH) were assessed. Basal blood samples were taken for IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and GHBP. All subjects underwent a GH provocative test with either clonidine, arginine or insulin. The subjects were divided into three groups: (A) patients with peak GH concentration <18 mIU/l in two different provocative tests (GH deficiency - GHD, n=33); (B) patients with peak GH between 18.2 and 39.8 mIU/l (normal response, n=78); (C) patients with peak GH >40 mIU/l (exaggerated GH response, n=53). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in age, height (standard deviation score (SDS)), parental height (SDS) and the difference between chronological age and bone age (DeltaBA) between the groups. Patients with GHD were heavier (P=0.039) and had significantly higher BMI (SDS) (P=0.001) than the other groups. MPH (SDS) was lower in the group of exaggerated responders (P=0.04) compared with the other groups. No significant differences were found between the groups for the biochemical parameters when expressed nominally or in SDS, except for IGFBP-3 (SDS), which was lower in the GHD group (P=0.005). The GHBP levels were not lower in the group of exaggerated GH response to provocative stimuli. Height (SDS) correlated negatively with basal GH values in pooled data of all the subjects (r=-0.358, P<0.0001), in normal responders (r=-0.45, P<0.0001) and in the exaggerated responders (r=-0.341, P<0.0001), but not in the GHD group. CONCLUSION: Exaggerated GH response to provocative tests alone does not appear to be useful in identifying children with GHI. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jul. The diagnostic approach to acromegaly and GH deficiency frequently includes measurement of several components of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system. IGF-I levels are reported to be good predictors of active and cured acromegaly, but are commonly found within the normal age-adjusted range in adult GH-deficient (GHD) patients. Circulating concentrations of IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), acid-labile subunit (ALS), and free IGF-I reflect the GH secretory status, but their diagnostic accuracy is still debated. In this study serum levels of total and free IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS, and IGFBP-3-IGF-I and IGFBP-3-ALS complexes were determined in patients previously diagnosed with active (n = 67) or inactive (n = 16) acromegaly and adult GHD (n = 34) and compared with results obtained in 58 healthy controls. In healthy subjects, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS, and both IGFBP-3 complexes declined with age; a correlation was found between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 (r = 0.59; P < 0.001), ALS (r = 0.67; P < 0.001), and free IGF-I (r = 0.40; P < 0.05). Active acromegalic patients showed a significant increase in all parameters tested. IGF-I concentrations were above +2 SD in 100% of patients, whereas slightly lower sensitivities were shown for IGFBP-3 (85%), ALS (88%), and free IGF-I (94%). In this group, IGF-I exhibited a slightly higher correlation with IGFBP-3 (r = 0.83; P < 0.001) than with ALS levels (r = 0.78; P < 0.001). In cured acromegalic patients, we observed the normalization of all parameters but free IGF-I levels. Adult GHD patients showed a significant reduction of all hormones. Unlike active acromegalic patients, all parameters had only a modest sensitivity in GHD; suppression below -2 SD was observed in 41% of GHD patients for IGF-I, 47% for IGFBP-3, 32% for ALS, and 35% for free IGF-I measurements. Previous radiotherapy and GH peak response below 3 microg/L were associated with significantly lower IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and ALS levels. IGF-I levels were significantly correlated to ALS (r = 0.68; P < 0.001) and IGFBP-3 (r = 0.64; P < 0.001) as well as with free IGF-I (r = 0.67; P < 0.001) levels. By multiple regression analysis, the number of anterior pituitary hormones impaired was the most predictive indicator of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and free IGF-I levels in GHD patients; conversely, the GH peak response better anticipated ALS concentrations. The pattern of IGFBP-3 complexes paralleled previous hormonal findings. In active acromegalic patients, IGFBP-3-IGF-I levels were 5.4-fold higher than in controls and were above +2 SD in 95% of patients, whereas IGFBP-3-ALS levels were elevated in 15% of cases. On the other hand, both IGFBP-3 complexes were able to predict GHD in only a minority of cases. Taken together, these data support the diagnostic role of IGF-I in acromegaly and suggest that free IGF-I and the IGFBP-3-IGF-I complex can assist diagnostic strategies in this condition. All markers are of limited predictive value in adult GHD, as hormonal values are commonly found within the normal limits. In these patients, low IGFBP-3 and IGF-I concentrations can add further clinical information on the residual GH activity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001 May. OBJECTIVE: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) belongs to a family of six structurally related IGF-binding proteins that are involved in the modulation of the biological effects of the IGFs. In order to obtain more insight into the clinical significance and regulation of IGFBP-4 in vivo we determined the levels of this protein by a specific radioimmunoassay in the human circulation under normal and various pathological conditions. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Selected human biological fluids and plasma samples from 804 normal healthy males and females, ranging from 0 to 78 years of age, were analysed. In addition, plasma samples from patients with several disorders (i.e. hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, GH-deficiency, acromegaly, cancer, chronic renal failure corticosteroid-treatment) were investigated. MEASUREMENTS: A specific RIA for hIGFBP-4 was developed, using a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a synthetic peptide containing amino acids 80-103 of the mature hIGFBP-4 sequence. RESULTS: In normal individuals circulating IGFBP-4 levels in males did not change with age. For females the values tended to increase slightly in older age. Overall, the mean +/- SD for males and females (189 +/- 83 microg/l and 193 +/- 72 microg/l, respectively) were not different. Normative range values of IGFBP-4 correlated weakly with those of IGF-II (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Neither hypothyroidism nor hyperthyroidism appeared to influence circulating IGFBP-4 levels since the levels were within the normal range. Both GH status and pharmacological doses of glucocorticoids, as employed in various chronic diseases, did not seriously affect plasma IGFBP-4 either. Under conditions with increased circulating PTH levels, i.e. dialysed adult patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and subjects with hyperparathyroidism, a weak positive relationship was noted between the plasma contents of IGFBP-4 and PTH. An excess of IGFBP-4 was found in plasma of both nondialysed and dialysed prepubertal growth retarded children with chronic renal failure (CRF) (mean SDS: 10.75 and 5.78, respectively). IGFBP-4 levels were inversely related to glomerular filtration rate. Similar results were obtained for dialysed adults with CRF. In a group of CRF children who had undergone renal transplantation, circulating IGFBP-4 levels were markedly lower (mean SDS: 3.75). There was no evidence for an increased secretion of IGFBP-4 in the circulation of most of the cancer patients with solid tumours. Several children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, however, showed elevated plasma IGFBP-4 levels (mean SDS: 1.27). The presence of IGFBP-4 could also be demonstrated in other human biological fluids. The highest amounts were found in amniotic fluid (391-717 microg/l) and follicular fluid (249-500 microg/l). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of plasma IGFBP-4 has been shown so far to be of minor clinical relevance. However, the results indicate that different concentration gradients between plasma and various other body fluids may exist. Therefore, it may well be that certain pathophysiological stimuli induce significant alterations in the local turnover rate of IGFBP-4 but that they are not reflected by changes in the circulating levels. The possibility of quantifying IGFBP-4 by RIA will facilitate further in vitro and in vivo studies on its regulation and function in humans. Horm Res. 2001. BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the relevance of parameters representing the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system with regard to growth hormone (GH) treatment during childhood. In adults, high IGF-I levels were found to be associated with side effects and long-term risks. AIM/METHOD: Our aim was to monitor the serum levels of IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) 3, and IGFBP-2 during long-term GH treatment of 156 patients with GH deficiency (GHD) and of 153 non-GHD patients. We determined the extent to which the IGF parameters exceed the normal ranges and identified those parameters which are predictive of 1st-year growth. RESULTS: In prepubertal GHD children, the levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 exceeded the 95th centile of the reference values for this age group in 2.3, 0.3, and 7.9% of the cases, respectively, whereas in prepubertal non-GHD children, the same parameters exceeded the 95th reference centile in 20.1, 3.5, and 32.2%, respectively. In pubertal GHD children IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 levels exceeded the 95th reference centile in 11.1, 1.5, and 15.4%, respectively. In pubertal non-GHD children, these levels also exceeded the 95th centile in 26.7, 7.0, and 41.4%, respectively. In both GHD and non-GHD groups, however, some patients had IGF parameters which were below the reference values. Our analysis showed that, in both groups, in addition to maximum GH, all IGF parameters (IGF-I, IGFBP-3, IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio, IGFBP-2 or derivatives) significantly extend the scope of a calculated model for predicting 1st-year height velocity. CONCLUSION: For reasons of safety and optimization of GH therapy, it is essential to follow up IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-2 levels regularly during childhood. Horm Res. 2001. AIM: This study was designed to investigate whether determination of plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) levels could be of benefit in the evaluation of childhood growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD). METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed on 91 prepubertal children referred for investigation of short stature. Maximal GH levels in plasma after provocative stimuli were between 1.0 and 93.0 mU/l, 6 subjects exhibiting peak values of <5 mU/l. Initially a GH peak of 20 mU/l was used as a cutoff limit to define GHD and idiopathic short stature (ISS) patients. The results of GH provocative tests were compared to age- and gender-based standard deviation scores (SDS) of plasma IGFBP-2, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the molar ratios of the latter two to IGFBP-2. The respective normative range values for these parameters were determined in plasma samples from 353 healthy children (i.e. 171 girls, 182 boys). RESULTS: Circulating IGFBP-2 levels did not correlate with height SDS, height velocity SDS or the peak GH levels after provocative stimuli. A weak negative relationship was found between IGFBP-2 and IGF-I. Plasma levels of IGFBP-2 in GHD patients were higher than those of ISS children, who had normal levels. Although at the optimal cutoff point of -0.71 SDS 91.5% of the GHD patients were identified correctly, a substantial proportion (71.9%) of the ISS subjects also had IGFBP-2 levels above this limit. The use of various combinations of IGFBP-2, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the derived ratios only slightly improved the diagnostic efficiency as compared to the results of the individual tests. Neither IGFBP-2 nor the IGFBP-3/IGFBP-2 and IGF-I/IGFBP-2 ratios were found to be related to the short- (1 year) or long-term (3 years) growth response to GH therapy. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that none of the tests investigated, either alone or in various combinations, are reliable in either predicting the peak GH level after provocative stimuli in prepubertal short children or in predicting their growth response to GH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Nov. We have studied the effect of estradiol (E2) on the GH-insulin-like growth factor (GH-IGF) axis in 15 prepubertal GH deficiency (GHD) children and 44 prepubertal or early pubertal children with idiopathic short stature (SS). All of them received a daily dose of micronized E2 (1 or 2 mg) or placebo, for 3 days, before a sequential arginine-clonidine test. In SS children, GH maximal responses were 17.8+/-10.9 on placebo and 27.9+/-14.5 microg/L on estrogen (P < 0.0001). The lower 95% confidence limits for GH maximal response changed from 3.7 microg/L (without E2) to 8.3 microg/L (on E2). In GHD children, no significant stimulatory effect of estrogen on GH levels was observed. After placebo, a cut-off limit of 3.7 microg/L (the lower 95% confidence interval limit) resulted in 73% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and an overall 90% diagnostic efficiency. After E2, a cut-off limit of 8.3 microg/L resulted in a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 98%, and a diagnostic efficiency of 95%. After placebo, 68% of SS showed normal IGF-I levels, and the mean did not change on E2 (13.7+/-6.3 vs. 14.3+/-6.8 nmol/L, not significant). In 93% of SS, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 levels were normal during placebo. On E2, mean IGFBP-3 did not change (2.63+/-0.70 vs. 2.70+/-0.70 mg/L, not significant). In 14 of 15 GHD patients, IGF-I values were below normal on placebo, and the mean of the group did not change after E2. During placebo, 13 of 15 GHD children presented low IGFBP-3 values. During E2, there was a small significant increase in IGFBP-3 values (1.06+/-0.58 vs. 1.20+/-0.69 mg/L, P < 0.02). The highest diagnostic efficiencies for IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were observed during placebo (75% and 91%, respectively). We conclude that GH stimulation tests after E2 priming had the highest diagnostic efficiency. Our findings suggest that the effect of estrogen priming on GH stimulated levels, by reducing the number of false nonresponders, might be useful to better discriminate between normal and abnormal GH status in SS children. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000 Sep. OBJECTIVE: Serum IGF-I levels are monitored during GH replacement treatment in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) to guide GH dose adjustment and to minimize occurrence of GH-related side-effects. This is not routine practice in children treated with GH. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in (1) serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio, and (2) serum leptin, an indirect marker of GH response, during the first year of GH treatment in children with disordered growth. DESIGN: An observational prospective longitudinal study with serial measurements at five time points during the first year of GH treatment was carried out. Each patient served as his/her own control. PATIENTS: The study included 31 patients, grouped as (1) GHD (n = 20) and (2) non-GHD (Turner syndrome n = 7; Noonan syndrome n = 4), who had not previously received GH treatment. MEASUREMENTS: Serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and leptin levels were measured before treatment and after 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months of GH treatment, with a mean dose of 0.5 IU/kg/wk in GHD and 0.7 IU/kg/wk in non-GHD groups. IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the calculated IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio were expressed as SD scores using reference values from the local population. RESULTS: In the GHD group, IGF-I SDS before treatment was lower compared with the non-GHD (-5.4+/-2.5 vs. -1.8+/-1.0; P<0.001). IGF-I (-1.8 SDS +/- 2.2) and IGFBP-3 (-1.1 SDS +/- 0.6) levels and their molar ratios were highest at 6 weeks and remained relatively constant thereafter. In the non-GHD group, IGF-I levels increased throughout the year and were maximum at 12 months (0.3 SDS +/- 1.4) while IGFBP-3 (1.1 SDS +/- 0.9) and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio peaked at 6 months. In both groups, IGF-I SDS and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 during treatment correlated with the dose of GH expressed as IU/m2/week (r-values 0. 77 to 0.89; P = 0.005) but not as IU/kg/week. Serum leptin levels decreased significantly during GH treatment in the GHD (median before treatment 4.0 microg/l; median after 12 months treatment 2.4 microg/l; P = 0.02) but not the non-GHD (median before treatment 3.0 microg/l; median after 12 months treatment 2.6 microg/l). In the GHD group, serum leptin before treatment correlated with 12 month change in height SDS (r = 0.70, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and their molar ratio during the first year of GH treatment differed between the GHD and non-GHD groups. Calculation of GH dose by surface area may be preferable to calculating by body weight. As a GH dose-dependent increase in serum IGF-I and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 may be associated with adverse effects, serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 should be monitored routinely during long-term GH treatment. Serum leptin was the only variable that correlated with first year growth response in GHD. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Apr. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is widely accepted as the method of choice to evaluate GH secretion capacity in adults with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders. However, the test is not suitable in the elderly or in patients with cardiovascular disease or seizure disorders. In recent years alternatives to the ITT have been introduced. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic outcome with the ITT, the pyridostigmine plus GHRH (PD + GHRH) test, the clonidine plus GHRH (CLO+GHRH) test, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in an unselected group of patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. An evaluation of the reproducibility of the different stimulation tests was included in the study. Based on repeated testing with the various GH stimulation tests in healthy adult males and females, the lower limits of normality for the ITT, the PD+GHRH test, and the CLO+GHRH test were 3.92, 12.8, and 19.0, microg/L, respectively. A consecutive group of 26 unselected patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders, 13 males and 13 females (median age, 44 ys), were tested twice with all stimulation tests, except that only 10 patients were tested once with the CLO+GHRH test due to side-effects related to clonidine. The peak GH responses between test 1 and test 2 correlated significantly in both the ITT and the PD + GHRH test (P < 0.02), and no significant difference was observed in the median peak response to repeated testing. In addition, no sex difference was observed. The coefficients of variation (CV) were 96% (ITT) and 45% (PD + GHRH), but in the majority of patients low values were repeatedly low. The peak GH response was significantly higher during the PD+GHRH test than during the ITT (P = 0.008). In the 10 patients tested with the PD+GHRH and CLO+GHRH tests there was no significant difference in the peak GH response (P = 0.398). When the test specific cut-off values were used, no significant difference in diagnostic outcome was observed between the various tests (P > 0.3). In contrast, the diagnosis obtained with IGF-I differed significantly from all GH stimulation tests (P < 0.03). Twenty (77%) and 22 (85%) patients were diagnosed to be GH deficient with the ITT and the PD+GHRH test, respectively. Of the 14 patients with multiple pituitary failure (>2 hormones affected), GH deficiency was present in more than 90% regardless of the type of stimulation test used. The IGF-I levels were only subnormal in 42% of the patients and did not correlate with the peak GH responses in any of the stimulation tests (P > 0.05). Except for 1 patient all patients with subnormal IGF-I were GH deficient in all stimulation tests. It is concluded that in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and a normal IGF-I level 2 stimulation tests should be performed to establish a diagnosis of GH deficiency. In patients with a subnormal IGF-I value a single GH stimulation test should be sufficient to confirm the presence of GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Mar. Previous observations raised the possibility that circulating GH-binding protein (GHBP) may serve as a useful index for tissue GH receptor (GHR) responsiveness in humans. Indeed, there are many examples to indicate that across a wide scope of comparative studies, ontogenic data, experimental systems, physiological conditions, nutritional states, and diseases there is a close relationship between the concentration of GHR and the level of serum GHBP. In the present review, we discuss various aspects that might affect differentially cellular GHR and circulating GHBP, based on species and tissue divergence, regulation of cell-surface GHR turnover, GHR cleavage mechanism, GHR mRNA splicing, and GH insensitivity (GHI) syndrome patients with normal or high serum GHBP levels. Most previous experimental data were collected through comparative analysis of human GHBP against GHR and GHBP determinations in animal models. Yet, GHBPs possess species-specific properties, and the mechanism for their generation and regulation display evolutionary divergence. Another important aspect is tissue divergence, in terms of GHR regulation and its cleavage to GHBP. Although GHBP is generated mainly from the liver GHR, many other tissues express GHRs and probably also contribute to the total GHBP level. Human GHBP is generated by proteolytic cleavage of GHR at the cell-surface and, thus, occupancy or modulation of GHR turnover/internalization would impact the level of cell-surface GHR that are available for proteolysis. An additional degree of complexity arises from recent reports, implicating a protein kinase C-regulated metalloprotease activity in GHBP generation. This suggests that the proteolytic system, which controls the specific cleavage mechanism and switch between GHR proteolysis and GHBP shedding, is a regulated process. Finally, differential splicing regulation to the full-length, active human GHR (hGHR) and the inactive truncated hGHRtr isoform messenger RNA transcripts might regulate both the production of GHBP and GHR bioactivity, as hGHRtr generates large amounts of GHBP but has a dominant negative effect on GH signaling. Several clinical GH-resistant conditions, such as liver cirrhosis, renal insufficiency, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, malnutrition, or critical illness are associated with reduced GHBP levels. However, this is not universally true, as in other conditions (e.g. early childhood, acromegaly) decreased GHBP levels are not associated with GHI. Divergence between serum GHBP and insulin-like growth factor I, such as which occur during puberty or obesity, also questions whether GHBP levels reflect GHR function. Even in patients with GHI syndrome, serum GHBP cannot be relied on to detect all GHR mutations. The correct assessment of GHR expression and GH functionality in an individual patient will require, in parallel to measurements of serum GHBP, additional detailed diagnostic screening of the entire GH-insulin-like growth factor I axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Apr. GH secretion was reevaluated after completion of GH treatment at a mean age of 19.2 +/- 3.2 yr in 35 young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency (GHD). The patients were subdivided into 4 groups according to their first pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings: group I, 11 patients with isolated GHD (IGHD) and normal pituitary volume (280 +/- 59.4 mm3); group II, 7 patients with IGHD and small pituitary gland (163.1 +/- 24.4 mm3; P = 0.0009 vs. group I); group III, 13 patients (5 with IGHD and 8 with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency) with congenital hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities such as pituitary hypoplasia (95.8 +/- 39.3 mm3; P < 0.00001 vs. group I and P = 0.003 vs. group II), pituitary stalk agenesis, and posterior pituitary ectopia; and group IV, 4 patients with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency secondary to craniopharyngioma. Pituitary MRI and GH secretory status were reevaluated after GH withdrawal using arginine, insulin induced-hypoglycemia, and sequential arginine-insulin tests. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were determined at the time of retesting and 6, 12, and 24 months after discontinuation of treatment in the patients with permanent GHD and after 6 months in those with normal GH responses to stimulation. The patients in groups I and II showed a normal response to stimulation after completion of GH treatment regardless of pituitary size, whereas all patients in groups III and IV still had a GH response of less than 3 microg/L to any of the tests. Pituitary volume normalized in 6 of 7 patients in group II, whereas in all patients in group III MRI studies confirmed the initial findings. Mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations at the time of retesting were significantly higher in groups I and II than in groups III and IV. In patients of groups III and IV, mean IGF-I was significantly decreased after 6 and 12 months, whereas IGFBP-3 was significantly decreased 12 months after treatment withdrawal. Our results confirm that a high proportion of children with IGHD and normal or small pituitary show normalization of GH secretion at the completion of GH treatment, whereas GHD is permanent in all patients with pituitary hypoplasia, pituitary stalk agenesis, and posterior pituitary ectopia. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 determinations shortly after GH withdrawal had limited value in the diagnosis of GHD of childhood onset associated with congenital hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities, but became accurate after 6-12 months. We suggest that patients with GHD and congenital hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities do not require further investigation of GH secretion, whereas patients with IGHD and normal or small pituitary gland should be retested well before the attainment of adult height. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999 Apr. OBJECTIVE: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) are GH-dependent and their concentrations have been used in the diagnosis of GH deficiency. Recently, the free fraction of IGF-I has received more attention. The aim of the study was to assess the role of free IGF-I in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults, and in follow-up during treatment with recombinant human GH (rhGH). DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We studied 24 adult patients with pituitary disease and GH deficiency and 25 matched controls. Nine patients were re-evaluated after 6 months of treatment with rhGH (0.25 U/kg/week). MEASUREMENTS: Serum levels of IGF-I, free IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-1 were measured by immunoradiometric assay. RESULTS: Serum free IGF-I levels were significantly lower in the GH deficient group than in the normal group (mean: 0.84 and 1.32 micrograms/l respectively, P = 0.0009). Furthermore, serum IGF-I levels were also lower (mean: 92.24 and 230.47 micrograms/l respectively, P < 0.0001). 63% of patients had serum IGF-I concentration below the normal range. For free IGF-I, 52% of the GH deficient patients showed levels below the lowest value obtained for the normal group. Seventy-five percent of the patients showed at least one of the two determinations below the normal range. The free-total IGF-I ratio was significantly higher (P = 0.025) in GH deficient group (range: 0.19-21.29, mean: 2.53) than in normal controls (range: 0.2-2.15, mean: 0.6). Regarding IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-1 no differences were observed between the two groups. During rhGH treatment the increase in serum total and free IGF-I and IGFBP-3 paralleled the beneficial effects on body composition. CONCLUSIONS: Free IGF-I may be another useful method for the diagnosis of GH deficiency, particularly if related to total IGF-I concentration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Jan. To evaluate the role of serum free or unbound insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) on bone growth, we measured serum free IGF-I levels in 354 healthy children and adults (193 males and 161 females, aged 0-40 yr) and in 21 prepubertal GH-deficient (GHD) children (complete GHD, n = 5; partial GHD, n = 16) using a recently developed immunoradiometric assay. We obtained the following results. 1) In the normal children, the serum free IGF-I levels were low in infancy (<1 yr of age; males, 0.71 +/- 0.26 microg/L, mean +/- SD; females, 1.05 +/- 0.49 microg/L), increased during puberty (males, 5.84 +/- 2.18 microg/L; females, 5.80 +/- 1.49 microg/L), and declined thereafter. 2) Free IGF-I in the serum occupied about 0.95-2.02% of the total IGF-I values, with the highest ratio occurring in infancy (males, 1.77 +/- 0.60%; females, 2.02 +/- 0.87%). 3) The SD scores of serum free IGF-I in the 21 GHD children ranged from -3.30 to 0.30, and the 5 complete GHD children had free IGF-I values more than -2 SD below those of age-matched normal subjects. 4) There was a significant correlation between the SD scores of free IGF-I and those of total IGF-I (r = 0.715; P < 0.0005) in the GHD children. 5) In the 16 partial GHD children receiving GH treatment, the serum free IGF-I levels were elevated to 209% of pretreatment levels after 1 month of GH treatment and remained high during GH therapy. The GH-induced increase in the serum free IGF-I levels was significantly higher than those of the total IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 levels. 6) The percent increase in the serum free IGF-I level after 1 month of GH treatment showed a significant positive correlation with that of the GH-induced improvement in the percent increase in the height velocity during 1 yr of GH therapy (r = 0.526; P < 0.05). These results show that free IGF-I in the serum has an essential role in bone formation because the higher free IGF-I levels were observed when the growth rate accelerated. The measurement of serum free IGF-I may become a useful tool for both diagnosing GH deficiency and predicting growth responses to long term GH therapy. Horm Res. 1999. More than 30 years after their introduction, growth hormone (GH) immunoassays showed the poorest inter-laboratory agreement of the various hormone assays evaluated in 1998 by the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme, in which different laboratories using different assays reported that analyses of identical samples differed two- to threefold in value. There is therefore an urgent requirement and desire within the scientific community, particularly within centres diagnosing and treating GH deficiency and acromegaly, to resolve this problem and to develop a GH assay(s) that measures solely all of the relevant components of circulating GH immunoreactivity. The main confounders in the estimation of GH levels (now that the use of GH standards other than that recommended by the World Health Organization has largely been eliminated) are GH heterogeneity, anti-GH antiserum binding site specificity and interference from circulating high-affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP). The effects of these factors are closely related. The present study investigates these factors, focussing on the influence of GHBP and antibody binding site specificity on various assays for GH. The findings lead the authors to suggest that a solution to the problem may be to develop a GH assay that measures specifically and solely all serum 22 kDa GH, as this is the major circulating fraction and carries the dominant GH bioactivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Oct. We report a case of short stature associated with high circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-10 and low levels of IGF-II responsive to pharmacological treatment with GH. Our patient suffered severe growth failure from birth (2.06 SD below the mean for normal full-term boys, and 5.2 and 7.3 SD below the mean at 5 and 10 months). Studies carried out before referral to our pediatric unit included normal 46,XY karyotype and normal encephalic imaging. Other endocrine and metabolic alterations and other systemic diseases were excluded. At 1.7 yr of age (length, 6.1 SD; weight, 4.6 SD; head circumference, 1.4 SD below the mean, respectively) the patient was referred to our pediatric unit. The baseline GH concentration was 31 microg/L, and the peak after an arginine load was 59.6 microg/L. In the same samples GH bioactivity was nearly superimposable (RIA/Nb2 bioactivity ratio = 0.9). Fasting insulin and glucose concentrations were 7.4 microU/mL and 65 mg/dL, respectively, both normally responsive to an oral glucose load. GH insensitivity was excluded by a basal IGF-I concentration (64 ng/mL) in the normal range for 0- to 5-yr-old boys and its increase after 2 IU/day hGH administration for 4 days. IGFBP-3 (0.5 microg/mL) was slightly reduced, whereas IGFBP-1 (2218 and 1515 ng/mL in two different basal samples) was well above the normal values for age and was suppressible by GH (maximum suppression, -77% at 84 h) and glucose load (maximum suppression, -46% at 150 min). The basal IGF-II concentration was below the normal range (86 ng/mL), whereas IGFBP-2 was normal (258 ng/mL). Analysis of the promoter region of IGFBP-1 and IGF-II failed to find major alterations. Neutral gel filtration of serum showed that almost all IGF-I activity was in the 35- to 45-kDa complex, coincident with IGFBP-1 peak, while the 150-kDa complex was absent, although the acid-labile subunit was normally represented. At 2.86 yr (height, 65.8 cm; height SD score, -7.3; height velocity SD score, -5) the patient underwent treatment with 7 IU/week human GH; after 4 months, the patient's height was 68.5 cm (height SD score, -6.9) corresponding to a growth velocity of 8.3 cm/yr (0.3 height velocity SD score). IGFBP-1 was reduced (216 ng/mL), although still in the high range, whereas IGF-I (71 ng/mL), IGFBP-3 (0.62 microg/mL), and IGF-II (111 ng/mL) were only slightly increased. The IGF-I profile showed activity in the 150-kDa region. In conclusion, we speculate that the increased IGFBP-1 values found in this patient produce 1) inhibition of IGF-I biological activity and, therefore, a resistance to IGF-I not due to a receptor defect for this hormone; 2) inhibition of formation of the circulating 150-kDa ternary complex and, therefore, an accelerated clearance rate of IGF peptides; 3) inhibition of the feedback action on GH, leading to increased GH levels, which could suggest the diagnosis of GH insensitivity syndrome; and 4) inhibition of body growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Aug. Serum levels of total insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) reflect endogenous GH secretion in healthy children, which makes them good diagnostic markers for screening of GH deficiency (GHD) in short children, although some controversy still exists. Only a minor fraction of the total IGF-I circulates in its free form, which is believed to be the biologically active form. However, our knowledge of the clinical or physiological value of determination of free IGF-I in serum is limited at present. In adults, the diagnostic value of total IGF-I and IGFBP-3 determinations in patients suspected of GHD has only been reported in a few studies, whereas no previous reports on the diagnostic value of free IGF-I levels in adults suspected of GHD exist. Serum levels of free IGF-I were determined in 1430 healthy children, adolescents, and adults by a newly developed, commercially available immunoradiometric assay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories) to establish valid normative data for this analysis. We studied the diagnostic value of free IGF-I in relation to total IGF-I and IGFBP-3 determinations in adults who were suspected of GHD. A GH provocative test, using oral clonidine, was performed in 108 adult patients who had previously been treated with GH in childhood. In healthy subjects, free IGF-I levels increased during childhood, with the highest mean values during puberty. After puberty, a subsequent decline in serum levels of free IGF-I was apparent. We found, unmeasurable free IGF-I values in 34 of the prepubertal children (3.3%). All individuals over 8 yr of age had measurable free IGF-I levels that amounted to approximately 1% of the total IGF-I concentrations. Free IGF-I levels were below--2 SD in 56 of 79 GHD patients (sensitivity, 71%) and above--2 SD in 24 of 29 patients with a normal GH response (specificity, 83%). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that free IGF-I was significantly dependent on peak GH levels, duration of the disease, and number of other pituitary axes affected. We conclude that free IGF-I serum levels increase during childhood with a peak in puberty, whereafter free IGF-I levels return to prepubertal levels. Three percent of healthy prepubertal children had unmeasurable free IGF-I levels using this assay. We found that determination of the free IGF-I serum concentration may predict the outcome of a GH provocative test in adults suspected of GHD, but that a single determination of free IGF-I offered no significant advantage compared to determination of total IGF-I or IGFBP-3 serum levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Apr. Serum levels of total insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) reflect the endogenous GH secretion in healthy children and exhibit little diurnal variation, which makes them good diagnostic markers for screening of GH deficiency (GHD) in short children, although some controversy still exists. In adults, the diagnostic value of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 suspected of GHD has been reported in only a few studies. We performed a GH provocative test, using oral clonidine, in 108 patients who had previously been treated with GH during childhood (73 men and 35 women). Basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were compared to those in 1237 healthy controls (312 controls > 18 yr) as well as to peak GH levels. Seventy-nine patients had peak GH values below a cut-off value of 7.5 micrograms/L (34 with isolated GHD), whereas 29 patients had a normal GH response (28 with previous isolated GHD), i.e. 45% of patients treated with GH during childhood because of isolated GHD had a normal GH response when retested in adulthood. Multiple regression analysis revealed that peak GH levels were dependent on the degree of hypopituitarism, body mass index, and duration of disease. IGF-I levels were below -2 SD in 60 of 79 GHD patients and above -2 SD in 21 of 29 patients with a normal GH response. IGFBP-3 levels were below -2 SD in 54 of 79 GHD patients and above -2 SD in 23 of 29 patients with a normal GH response. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were significantly dependent on peak GH levels and the number of other pituitary axes affected. In this analysis, duration of disease was significantly associated with both IGF-I and IGFBP-3, whereas body mass index was significantly associated with IGFBP-3, but not with IGF-I. We conclude that IGF-I and IGFBP-3 determinations predict the outcome of a GH provocative test in adults suspected of GHD and believe that IGF-I as well as IGFBP-3 serum concentrations are valuable diagnostic parameters in the evaluation of GHD in adults with childhood-onset disease. We suggest that children who have been treated with GH should undergo reassessment of their GH secretory status as young adults by provocative testing as well as by IGF-related peptides before continued adult GH replacement therapy is considered. However, our data suggest that it is not necessary to reconfirm GH deficiency by GH provocative testing in young adults who have two or more pituitary hormone deficiencies in addition to GHD. J Pediatr. 1997 Feb. Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) reflect the secretion of endogenous growth hormone (GH) in healthy children and exhibit little diurnal variation, which makes them potential candidates for screening of GH deficiency (GHD). We evaluated serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in relation to the outcome of GH provocative testing in 203 children and adolescents (111 boys and 92 girls) in whom GHD was suspected. A total of 1030 children served as control subjects. In children less than 10 years of age, IGF-I levels were below the cutoff limit in 8 of 15 children with GHD (sensitivity 53.3%) and above the cutoff limit in 47 of 48 children with a normal GH response (specificity 97.9%). Similarly, IGFBP-3 levels were below the cutoff limit in 9 of 15 children with GHD (sensitivity 60%) and above the cutoff limit in 47 of 48 children with a normal GH response (specificity 97.9%). Consequently the predictive value of a positive test result in prepubertal children was 88.8% for IGF-I and 90% for IGFBP-3. In children and adolescents between 10 and 20 years of age, IGF-I levels were below the cutoff limit in 34 of 46 children with GHD (sensitivity 73.9%) and above the cutoff limit in 63 of 94 children with normal GH response (specificity 67%). IGFBP-3 levels were below the cutoff limit in 26 of 46 children with GHD (sensitivity 56.5%) and above the cutoff limit in 74 of 94 children with a normal GH response (specificity 78.7%). Accordingly the positive predictive value and in 10- to 20-year-old children was 52.3% for IGF-I and 56.5% for IGFBP-3. Combination use of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 gave additional diagnostic information. We conclude that a subnormal IGF-I level, and especially a subnormal IGFBP-3 level, are highly predictive of a subnormal GH response to a provocative test in prepubertal children in whom GHD is suspected. On the other hand, a normal IGF-I or IGFBP-3 level does not exclude GHD. The predictive value of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in pubertal children is diminished in comparison with that in prepubertal children. We believe that IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are valuable tools in the evaluation of childhood GHD. J Endocrinol Invest. 1996 Nov. In order to evaluate the impairment of GH response in patients affected by Prader-Labhardt-Willi (PLW) syndrome, in 18 patients we studied GH response to clonidine and to GHRH + pyridostigmine, a cholinergic drug which enhances GHRH induced GH responsiveness in obese patients. After clonidine GH response was abnormal in 14/18 subjects (mean GH peak: 4.1 +/- 1.3 micrograms/l; area under curve: 208.1 +/- 74.2 micrograms/l.h) while all but 5 patients showed an inadequate GH response to GHRH + pyridostigmine (mean GH peak: 13.4 +/- 2.5 micrograms/l; area under curve: 903.4 +/- 171.0 micrograms/l.h). However, in the three patients with low adiposity index, GH response to GHRH + pyridostigmine was significantly higher than that observed in fatter subjects. In addition, GH response to GHRH + pyridostigmine was negatively correlated to age and adiposity index. In conclusion, our data are consistent with the hypothesis of the existence of a complex derangement of GH neuroendocrine regulation in these subjects. Pediatr Res. 1996 May. GH insensitivity may be an inherited condition or may arise as a consequence of disease of malnutrition. Laron syndrome is the most severe form of GH insensitivity, arising from an absent or defective GH receptor. Less severe forms of GH insensitivity, however, may exist, resulting in short stature but in few other features of Laron syndrome. We have identified a heterogeneous group of children with short stature and either high basal (> 10 mU/L) or high peak GH levels (> 40 mU/L) on GH provocation testing, to examine biochemical markers of GH sensitivity. These children received 4 d of GH (0.1 U/kg) and the increment in IGF-I, IGF binding protein (BP)-3, and GHBP was determined. Eight GHD children, commencing GH therapy, were recruited as positive controls. The two groups could not be differentiated by age, height SDS (SD score), height velocity SDS, or body mass index. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation were correlated in all children (delta SDS IGF-I versus delta SDS IGFBP-3, r = 0.49, p = 0.03). Neither basal GHBP levels or the increment in GHBP were predictive of the IGF-I or IGFBP-3 response to GH. The GHI group had a significantly reduced IGFBP-3 response to stimulation with 4 d of GH (median percent increment in IGFBP-3, 26%, versus 72% in the GHD group, P = 0.03); their IGF-I response to GH was also reduced (median % increment in IGF-I 75% versus 144% in the GH deficient group), but this did not achieve significance, p = 0.06. In all children, the percentage rise or delta SDS in both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 inversely correlated with the GH peak obtained on provocation testing, the latter being the most significant determinant of GH peak. We propose that the "IGF generation test", in particular IGFBP-3 generation, can be used in the investigation of partial GH insensitivity. Further work, however, is required to establish diagnostic criteria for partial GH insensitivity. Eur J Endocrinol. 1996 Feb. Serum levels of total insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) correlate with growth hormone (GH) secretory status and are a useful parameter in the diagnostic evaluation of GH deficiency. Serum total IGF-I levels represent the combined quantity of free or unbound IGF-I and IGF-I that is bound to specific IGF binding proteins. Free IGF-I (fIGF-I), which is postulated to be the bioactive fraction, accounts for only a small fraction of the total amount. We have recently developed a new immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for plasma fIGF-I and have investigated fIGF-I in relation to GH status. The simple, non-extraction assay procedure involves the capture of unbound IGF-I by anti-IGF-I antibody coated to polystyrene beads and detection by a radiolabelled anti-IGF-I antibody directed to a separate epitope. Preliminary studies demonstrated that the fIGF-I IRMA does not measure IGF-I that is complexed to IGF-binding proteins and that the equilibrium between the free and bound fractions is not disturbed during the assay. Free IGF-I levels were compared to total IGF-I levels measured in the same IRMA after acid-ethanol extraction of the samples. Normal levels of fIGF-I from infancy through adulthood were found to have a close correlation with total IGF-I levels, with the lowest levels occurring in infancy and peak levels during puberty. Patients with complete GH deficiency had low levels of both fIGF-I and total IGF-I, with 94% and 100% of the levels below the 5ht percentile for age, respectively. On the other hand, approximately 90% of patients with normal IGF binding protein-3 levels among partial GH deficiency and normal short children had free and total IGF-I levels above the 5th percentile for age. These data indicate that the clinical utility of plasma fIGF-I measurements is similar to measurements of total IGF-I in the evaluation of childhood GH deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995 Jul. OBJECTIVE: The measurement of serum immunoreactive IGFBP-3 levels has been proposed as a screening test to identify children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). We tested the sensitivity and specificity of the IGFBP-3 assessment in comparison with the measurement of IGF-I. DESIGN: We assessed the IGFBP-3 and IGF-I circulating levels in normal subjects and patients with GHD or idiopathic short stature (ISS). PATIENTS: Eighty-two normal subjects, 16 GHD, and 10 children with ISS were studied. Controls were divided into three age groups: group A, 1-4 years (n = 16); group B, 5-9 years (n = 35), and group C, 10-14 years (n = 31). MEASUREMENTS: All subjects underwent standard anthropometry. In short patients, GH secretory status was assessed by clonidine and arginine stimulation tests. IGFBP-3 and IGF-I circulating levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: IGFBP-3 and IGF-I levels were closely related (r = 0.51, P < 0.0001) and IGFBP-3 was less age dependent than IGF-I (r = 0.57, P < 0.02 vs r = 0.64, P = 0.0001). Sensitivity (true positive ratio) and specificity (true negative ratio) of IGFBP-3 measurement were 50 and 92% respectively, whereas sensitivity and specificity of IGF-I assessment were 75 and 90% respectively. Below the age of 5 years, sensitivity was 20% for IGFBP-3 and 40% for IGF-I; specificity was 94% for IGFBP-3 and 88% for IGF-I. CONCLUSIONS: IGFBP-3 measurement had poor sensitivity in detecting growth hormone deficient patients, offering no diagnostic advantage over IGF-I, even in the first years of life, although, due to the high specificity, the finding of subnormal levels of IGFBP-3 was strongly suggestive of growth hormone deficiency. The presence of low IGFBP-3 and IGF-I levels in a short child with normal GH response to provocative tests should prompt further investigations, such as the determination of spontaneous GH secretion or assessment of the GH binding proteins together with an IGF-I and/or IGFBP-3 generation test, in order to identify neurosecretory dysfunction or GH receptor deficiency. Finally, we believe that there is no definitive test for diagnosing or excluding growth hormone deficiency and detailed analysis of the results of endocrine tests, clinical findings and other laboratory and radiological information is necessary to maximize diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Endocrinol. 1994 Jul. We have shown previously that serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels have good predictive value for complete, but not partial, growth hormone deficiency (GHD). In this study, we compare IGFBP-3 levels in short children previously divided into groups on the basis of their post-stimulation GH levels. Complete GHD (N = 59) included those children with peak post-stimulation GH < 5 micrograms/l. The partial GHD group (N = 49) had post-stimulation GH peaks of > 5 micrograms/l but < 10 micrograms/l. The normal children with short stature (N = 103) had post-stimulation GH peaks > 10 micrograms/l. Partial GHD and normal children with short stature also were divided into either low IGF-I or normal IGF-I subgroups. The clinical sensitivity of IGFBP-3 for complete GHD was 92%, whereas its sensitivity for partial GHD was 39%. For partial GHD, among those with low IGF-I (N = 19) 68% were also low for IGFBP-3, while 80% of those with normal IGF-I (N = 30) were also normal for IGFBP-3. The clinical specificity of IGFBP-3 for normal children with short stature was 69%. For these groups, among those with low IGF-I (N = 22) 73% also were low for IGFBP-3, while 80% of those with normal IGF-I (N = 81) also were normal for IGFBP-3. In addition, we tested whether IGFBP-3 can predict the response to GH treatment in prepubertal children by comparing pretreatment IGFBP-3 with the height gain achieved by 1 year of GH treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Dec. Twenty-seven patients with GH insensitivity were identified from 44 possible cases, using a scoring system based on height standard deviation score (SDS), basal GH, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF-I response to IGF-I generation test, and GH-binding protein (GH-BP) determinations. The 27 cases were from 8 European countries and Australia. Clinical features were as follows: age 2.8-22.6 yr; 12 male, 15 female, 19 prepubertal. Birth weight was median -0.72 SDS (1.75(-)-3.29) and birth length, median -1.59 SDS (0.63(-)-3.63). Hypoglycemia had been documented in 33% of the cases, and micropenis was present in 58% of the males. At assessment, height was median -6.1 SDS (-3.8(-)-10.2), weight was median -3.2 SDS (-0.1 to -5.2), and percentage weight for height, median 111.3 (72-271). Puberty was absent in 2 boys aged 15 yr and in 3 girls aged 13 yr. Bone age was delayed in 19 of the 27 patients. Endocrine investigations showed basal serum GH median 17 micrograms/L (0.5-79), IGF-I values less than 5th percentile, and all except 2, age less than 8 yr, less than 0.1 percentile for age. Percentage increment of IGF-I during IGF-I generation test (hGH 0.1 U/kg body weight daily x 4) did not exceed twice the intraassay coefficient of variation, being less than 0.1 percentile for age. IGF-II was median 135.0 micrograms/L (62-232), all values being less than 5th percentile for age. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) values were median 0.53 mg/L (0.10-1.17 mg/L), all being less than 5th percentile for age. IGFBP-3 values after hGH remained less than 5th percentile. IGFBP-1 values showed the normal fall with age, some being above the normal range; IGFBP-2 values were normal. There was a positive correlation between height SDS and IGF-II SDS (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) and IGFBP-3 (r = 0.64, P < 0.001). Specific binding of [125I]hGH to GH-BP was undetectable in 18 patients and extremely low (< or = 5.6%) in 2. GH-BP was normal (14.2-45.9% radioactivity) in 7 subjects, all female, demonstrating that normal GH-BP does not exclude GH insensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Nov. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 and -3 (IGFBP-2 and -3) are members of a family of proteins that are present in extracellular fluids and bind IGF-I and -II. IGFBP-2 is regulated differently from IGF-I and IGFBP-3, because its serum concentrations are elevated in some adults with GH deficiency (GHD), whereas IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations are usually decreased. The purposes of this study were to define the normal range of IGFBP-2 concentrations in children, to determine its efficacy in the diagnosis of GHD, and to compare the diagnostic value of measurements of the serum GH response to provocative testing with results of measurements of IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I. Mean serum IGFBP-2 concentrations ranged from 263 +/- 101 ng/mL (mean +/- SD) during infancy to 136 +/- 38 ng/mL in normal 15- to 18-yr-olds (P < 0.001), whereas IGFBP-3 increased from 1211 +/- 384 to 2781 +/- 382 ng/mL in the same age groups. Thirty-nine of 49 children with GHD and low IGF-I values (serum GH response, < or = 1 ng/mL after 2 provocative tests) had serum IGFBP-2 concentrations that were greater than 2 SD above their corresponding age-adjusted means. In contrast all 49 of these children had IGFBP-3 values that were below normal for age. Because serum IGFBP-2 concentrations are regulated by GH directly and not through IGF-I, the IGFBP-2 to IGF-I ratio was used to determine whether it improved diagnostic accuracy. Fifty of 57 GH-deficient children had IGFBP-2/IGF-I ratios that were greater than 2 SD above the mean. This included 48 of 49 children with low IGF-I and 2 of 8 children with normal IGF-I. Fifty-three of the 57 children with GHD had decreased IGFBP-3 values. Among 23 children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) who had normal responses to GH stimulation testing (serum GH, > 10 ng/mL), 7 had low IGF-I values. Of the 7, all had an increased IGFBP-2/IGF-I ratio and a low IGFBP-3 level. Of the remaining 16 children with normal IGF-I, 13 had a normal IGFBP-2/IGF-I ratio and normal IGFBP-3 values. Three had low IGFBP-3 and an increased IGFBP-2/IGF-I ratio. In 76% of the 80 short-statured patients studied, there was concordance among serum GH responses to provocative tests, IGF-I, IGFBP-2/IGF-I ratio, and IGFBP-3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989 Dec. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-II are associated in the blood with specific binding proteins (BPs), forming complexes that elute in gel filtration with estimated mol wt around 40 and 150 kD. The latter appears to be under GH control. Five molecular forms of BP (41.5, 38.5, 34, 30, and 24 kD) have been identified by Western blotting using 125I-labeled IGF. All five forms are present in the smaller complexes, but only the 41.5- and 38.5-kD forms are found in the larger complexes. In this study immunoblotting showed that the 41.5- and 38.5-kD forms were recognized by antibodies directed against the GH-dependent BP purified from human plasma, and the 30-kD form was recognized by antibodies directed against the BP purified from amniotic fluid. The 34- and 24-kD forms proved to be immunologically unrelated to the other three. In sera with large quantities of the 41.5- and 38.5-kD forms, an additional band was often observed immediately ahead of the migration front of the 30 kD band. This was recognized by the anti-GH-dependent BP antibody and probably corresponds to a degradation product of the 41.5- and 38.5-kD BPs. Serum 41.5- and 38.5-kD BPs have been found to be elevated in acromegaly, where GH hypersecretion causes increased IGF-I levels, and diminished in cases of genetic or idiopathic GH deficiency and defects of the GH receptor (Laron's syndrome), where both IGF-I and IGF-II are decreased, as well as in Pygmy adults and children who have isolated IGF-I deficiency. In all of these conditions, the proportions of the 34- and 30-kD forms were inversely related to those of the 41.5- and 38.5-forms. Under treatment, the BP profiles tended to return to normal. In cases of GH deficiency caused by a tumor, the BP profiles resembled those of hypopituitary or normal serum, depending on whether IGF levels were diminished or normal. It, therefore, seems that BP synthesis is coordinated with IGF-I synthesis and may not be directly GH dependent. The results of neutral pH gel filtration analysis of hypopituitary (idiopathic and tumoral) and normal sera point to a relationship between the levels of circulating IGFs and those of the 150-kD IGF-BP complex whose binding units are the 41.5- and 38.5-kD BPs. It, therefore, seems that the 150-kD complex controls the bioavailability of IGF-I and IGF-II. Ann Clin Biochem. 1986 Jul. Of the somatomedins so far measured, the selective quantitation of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) appears to have the greatest potential in clinical diagnosis. There have been two approaches to the development of immunoassay systems. One type uses antibodies raised against synthetic fragments of IGF-I which exhibit cross-reactivity with the whole hormone. Such assay systems may be adequate for measuring normal adult plasma IGF-I levels, but the potential for the higher sensitivity required for detecting sub-normal plasma levels in young children is apparent only in methods using antibodies raised against the complete hormone. IGF-I in plasma exists as part of a high molecular weight complex in which it is bound to carrier proteins. The binding proteins may interfere with plasma IGF-I measurements by radioligand assays. Direct analysis of untreated plasma samples is claimed to be possible using disequilibrium assay conditions but in order to maximise assay sensitivity it is necessary to employ an initial extraction stage in order to eliminate binding protein interference. Whether the measurement of plasma IGF-I can or should be used in addition to, or as a replacement for, plasma growth hormone (GH) measurement in the clinical assessment of growth disorders remains a controversial issue. Available evidence indicates that a single, random plasma IGF-I level provides an accurate reflection of GH secretion. Adequate discrimination between the elevated levels in acromegaly and normal reference values has been demonstrated. However, in the investigation of growth-retarded children available radioimmunoassay (RIA) methods have proved only partially successful because of the age-related nature of normal plasma IGF-I concentrations. Existing assays appear capable of identifying sub-normal plasma levels after the age of approximately 4 years. In younger subjects an improvement in assay sensitivity is required in order to establish with greater accuracy the relevant normal ranges. Improvements in the identification of the particular lesion responsible for retarded growth in a child can be achieved by measurement of both plasma GH and IGF-I concentrations. The predictive value of the acute plasma IGF-I response to single-dose GH therapy may identify patients who will respond to long-term GH therapy. Better, more informed decisions on subsequent treatment may therefore be made. Apart from GH control, several other factors influence circulating IGF-I levels. Nutritional status can be assessed through reference to IGF-I analysis, overall catabolic or anabolic processes being associated with decreasing or increasing plasma IGF-I levels respectively. |